Fix various spelling errors
This commit is contained in:
@@ -98,44 +98,44 @@ TEST_CASE("[NodePath] Relative path") {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE("[NodePath] Absolute path") {
|
||||
const NodePath node_path_aboslute = NodePath("/root/Sprite2D");
|
||||
const NodePath node_path_absolute = NodePath("/root/Sprite2D");
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_aboslute.get_as_property_path() == NodePath(":root/Sprite2D"),
|
||||
node_path_absolute.get_as_property_path() == NodePath(":root/Sprite2D"),
|
||||
"The returned property path should match the expected value.");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_aboslute.get_concatenated_subnames() == "",
|
||||
node_path_absolute.get_concatenated_subnames() == "",
|
||||
"The returned concatenated subnames should match the expected value.");
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_aboslute.get_name(0) == "root",
|
||||
node_path_absolute.get_name(0) == "root",
|
||||
"The returned name at index 0 should match the expected value.");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_aboslute.get_name(1) == "Sprite2D",
|
||||
node_path_absolute.get_name(1) == "Sprite2D",
|
||||
"The returned name at index 1 should match the expected value.");
|
||||
ERR_PRINT_OFF;
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_aboslute.get_name(2) == "",
|
||||
node_path_absolute.get_name(2) == "",
|
||||
"The returned name at invalid index 2 should match the expected value.");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_aboslute.get_name(-1) == "",
|
||||
node_path_absolute.get_name(-1) == "",
|
||||
"The returned name at invalid index -1 should match the expected value.");
|
||||
ERR_PRINT_ON;
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_aboslute.get_name_count() == 2,
|
||||
node_path_absolute.get_name_count() == 2,
|
||||
"The returned number of names should match the expected value.");
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_aboslute.get_subname_count() == 0,
|
||||
node_path_absolute.get_subname_count() == 0,
|
||||
"The returned number of subnames should match the expected value.");
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_aboslute.is_absolute(),
|
||||
node_path_absolute.is_absolute(),
|
||||
"The node path should be considered absolute.");
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
!node_path_aboslute.is_empty(),
|
||||
!node_path_absolute.is_empty(),
|
||||
"The node path shouldn't be considered empty.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ TEST_CASE("[Array] Duplicate recursive array") {
|
||||
Array a_shallow = a.duplicate(false);
|
||||
CHECK_EQ(a, a_shallow);
|
||||
|
||||
// Deep copy of recursive array endup with recursion limit and return
|
||||
// Deep copy of recursive array ends up with recursion limit and return
|
||||
// an invalid result (multiple nested arrays), the point is we should
|
||||
// not end up with a segfault and an error log should be printed
|
||||
ERR_PRINT_OFF;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user